Since graduating from the Napier MA (over a year ago now and
STILL banging on about it!) I haven’t felt the need to maintain much of an
online blog presence. Most of my online activities take place on Goodreads
where I discuss what matters most to me—literature. Or, if you like, books. Discuss might not be the word. I write
brief capsule reviews of the books I read and ten or so people ‘like’ my
reviews without comment. If I feel like it, I leave inane comments on other
people’s reviews. Still, I like it there.
My book group still meets on weekends, and the Ulysses meetup was extremely useful and
laid-back. I sometimes feel inadequate as to how I dissect a text. I have strong
urges to write extremely analytical closely-read essays on the books I read,
but that would take up too much of my time, and who would care? I could spend
over a fortnight writing one of those, all for the satisfaction of having autopsied
the book so I briefly have “complete mastery” over it, only to forget the
drivel I wrote in a few weeks. I did this for a spell between 2004-2007 with
albums and made £300 on a reviewing site. Goodreads pays nada.
The best-friends-for-life writing-network-of-Napier-alumni
thing hasn’t happened. Perhaps I was too naïve to assume people would want to start a collective for sharing and editing each other’s work with frequent
meet-ups and so on . . . people do things, so I am told, in their lives, that
make these things impossible. I did set up a semi-useful FB group which has
already been forgotten about. My suspicion is people find publishers for their
own work and forget to share, or think fuck
it—I want to have the edge and don’t share on purpose. Does that sound
embittered and envious of me? Possibly. I’m one of the few people who truffles
for publishers and anthologies and then shares. I think people, especially
writers, are inherently selfish and perhaps need to be to survive in this fucking horrible world. I don’t like it, but
how many writers, upon winning a contest, will punch the air and say, in your face suckers! All of them? Writing
is as predatory as any other business.
At the moment, I’m not writing with a commercial eye, I’m
focusing on writing what I want to write. Arlene’s
Atoms is, possibly, the closest to a mainstream thing I will produce. I
recently sent the book, fatalistically, to a slew of small presses, skipping
the big hitters. Realistically, if I have a small-press book, or maybe two or
three in time, behind me, I will have more chance of being glanced at by the
big fellas. So my hope is that one of the many fine small presses will pick it up. If they don’t, I will need to take up mainlining heroin into my knees. I think we were taught to
be too ambitious at the Napier MA. Although the crushing futility of the
endeavour of writing was repeatedly emphasised by David Bishop, I think I
shouldn’t have been advised to sub to agents. It was a waste of time—I’m an
unknown with no prizes under my belt. But what does that matter now?
I have a new novella on the go at the moment: the form and
structure and content are cohering nicely. I write fairly quickly once these
things are in place, so hopefully this will be finished early next year.
Yes. To pretty much all that you said. Just that. Yes.
ReplyDelete